> but Python isn't trying to have the "optimal cutting-edge" thing in its
> standard library. More like "the well-established, widely-used" thing.
I also agree with this.
At present, I have confidence in zstd. There seems to be a trend that some
programmer users are switching to zstd.
Don't know if it will be popular among non-programmer users. If this happens in
the future, what path will it take?
> I feel like you making Zstd available on PyPI is wonderful, and a huge
> service to the community.
There was already a zstandard module on PyPI since 2016, but its API is
different from bz2/lzma module.
I intentionally didn't look at its implementation when implementing the module.
https://pypi.org/project/zstandard/
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/MYREWZ4HN2QIAQK23C63B4V3HRLSK76C/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
