I'm interested in knowing when (id(x), x) would be preferable over
(type(x), x).

On Mon, 2020-12-21 at 17:52 +0000, David Mertz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 5:27 PM Christopher Barker
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Surely what you're looking for is some kind of typed hash table?
> > 
> > Maybe, maybe not. My impression is that the Typed hash  table is a
> > kluge to get around this one issue. As others have pointed out, 1
> > and 1.0 are considered equal, and thus hash the same — a typed
> >  hash table would not consider them the same. And while maybe
> > useful, it would violate the spirit of duck typing. If you really
> > want that kind of static typing, maybe Python is not the language
> > for the job.
> > 
> 
> 
> I've occasionally wanted an "identity set".  Except, after I want it,
> I pretty quickly always realize I don't actually want it.  Exactly
> what strings and integers will actually be interned, etc? There's a
> lot of implementation dependent stuff there that isn't a clear
> semantics (I mean, it's knowable, but too complex).
> 
> In any case, I know how to write that in a few lines if I feel like
> having it.  Basically just use pairs `(id(x), x)` in a set.  That's
> more specific than `(type(x), x)`, although both have their own
> gotchas.
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/PWFX7WBNRQN5UBT27R2SOUBMUOXGVF6P/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/4N6EFYRFOWFSK7O4NQCSUMAFTOIUIDXP/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to