On Sat, Oct 16, 2021, 11:42 AM Erik Demaine > > But the first one is much more suggestive of a generator comprehension. I > > would want/expect it to be equivalent to itertools.chain(), not create a > > tuple. > > I guess you were referring to `(*it for it in its)` (proposed notation) > rather > than `(*it1, *it2, *it3)` (which already exists and builds a tuple). > > Very good point! This is confusing. I could also read `(*it for it in > its)` > as wanting to build the following generator (or something like it): >
Oops. Yes. I trimmed the wrong part from my phone. What you write! > >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/2DVYZFEIF3H7DJJD36XQRKQCSAFATB7C/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
