[Python-ideas] Re: PEP 671 (late-bound arg defaults), next round of discussion!

[Rob Cliffe via Python-ideas]

I used to prefer `:=` but coming back to this topic after a long 
interval I am happy with `=>` and perhaps I even like it more, Chris.😁
The PEP status is "Draft".  What are the chances of something happening 
any time soon, i.e. the PEP being considered by the Steering Committee?  
Or is it still too controversial, or is there some other obstacle?
In case it's not clear, I support the PEP.  I think it plugs an obvious gap.
Best wishes
Rob Cliffe
On 13/06/2022 09:38, Steve Jorgensen wrote:
To clarify my statement about readability of the '@' prefix option…

I think that its meaning is less clear if one doesn't already know what the 
syntax means. I think the code would be easier to skim, however, using that 
option after one does know its meaning.

My favorite options are '@' or '?=' (tied), followed by ':=' followed by '=>'.
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/TDPKOPGWQ4ORRJDHWJMX5GMW2TQ5FI5B/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/KWYUYR3WT3VFUI4CNCGQT6ZZYOIBUPQB/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/