> On 5 Jul 2023, at 21:07, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 at 04:02, Dom Grigonis <dom.grigo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> What I would alternatively propose is to introduce a couple of (meaningless >> operators), so that library developers can make use of them as they wish. >> What characters aren't used? “$, ?, `” (or are they?). >> > > What should their precedences be? Operators have to be given that, at > least. Unfortunately, whatever precedence you choose, it's going to be > awkwardly wrong for at least some potential use-cases. Lowest precedence?
a + b + c ?op? a / b / c a + b + (c ?op? a) / b / c As this in theory is the highest level operator, given it would mostly be used in framework level packages, it’s precedence naturally begs for the lowest status. But yes, then this would limit the operator to certain use cases. E.g. it wouldn’t be suitable to solve the problem of OP. > That said, though, there are some pretty cool packages out there that > create arbitrary operators. Some of them take advantage of multiple > operators to allow multiple effective precedences. Consider for > example: > https://pypi.org/project/infix/ Infix operator is where my though process began in the first place - see the e-mail. My proposal is exactly to have a free operator to be used in packages such as the one you pointed to. Ok, so Infix works in the way that operands can not recognise object in between operators, so that it falls to `dunders` of the object between operators. Although this works, there would be more flexibility if both the operands and operator class had `free` operator implementation space. Some new patterns might arise. It would be cleaner approach, currently `Infix` feels a bit hacky to me due to reusing of operators, which have another purpose. > ChrisA > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/YQDJ5UMH23FYL5FVFNBLWPOROD5ZZQOG/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/RVAKUXJ53QUBWFBGOSWTHP47HE3C4GCR/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
