Stephen Eilert escreveu: > BartlebyScrivener wrote: > >> Well, I am woefully unqualified to speak to the general state of Python >> gui frameworks, but I am in a similar situation as the OP, i.e., a >> beginner looking to TRY some easy gui programming in Python. Not being >> a computer science person, just an amateur scripter, I tend to learn >> best from lots of examples. >> >> With all of that as background, I downloaded the latest wxPython demos >> and docs yesterday. I suggest that the OP do the same. The demo.py >> program is an amazing piece of work. It's loaded with specific examples >> which allow you to view the frame or dialog etc, and then look behind >> it to see the code used to create it. >> >> rd >> > > > You can also download wxGlade and ask it to generate the code for you. > You just have to layout the components the way you want it, wxGlade > does the rest. Even though there are tons of wxWidgets components it > does not support, you can put something as a placeholder and just > replace the code later. > > For looks, speed, ease of use (even though it is not Pythonic), > platform compatibility and use of native widgets, my vote goes to > wxPython. If you don't mind adding another layer (as I doubt the > runtime performance suffers much - if at all), there is dabo.ui (thanks > to whoever pointed it out to me). > > PyQT looks good... under KDE, alien under Win32.
PyQt4 is already out and trust me... Is it great :o) Phil is doing a great job with it and Detlev (Eric3/4 developer) already released some snapshots of eric4, so the windows python users can expect a great python enviroment in the future. > PyGTK looks good under > Gnome, and acceptable on Win32, even if their widgets do not always act > as Win32 users would expect. > > -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
