J. Clifford Dyer a écrit : > On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 04:11:07PM -0000, Grant Edwards wrote > regarding Re: Python Magazine: Issue 1 Free!: > >> On 2007-10-05, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>>> I've just been told by the editors at Python Magazine that >>>>> the first issue is out. >>>> >>>> The first issue is issue number 10? >>>> >>>> That's a bit silly. >>> >>> It's the October edition. They obviously decided to make sure the >>> month numbering was consistent across the volumes. >> >> I presumed that was the reasoning. It just seems counter-intuitive >> (and sort of un-Pythonic) to start numbering a sequence of objects >> at 10. ;) >> > > > Well, it's also unpythonic to start numbering a sequence at 1, but > it's clearly the right thing to do in this case.
As far as I'm concerned, if I had to number a magazine about programming, I'd obviously start with 0. Then it would be n°1, n°10, n°11, n°100 etc !-) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
