On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 06:07:45 -0800, cokofreedom wrote: > Anyone else noticed that the OP has not actually replied to any of the > suggestions...
Sorry. I was just fascinated at the turns it was taking. But the first answer was fine for me: for name in apps[:]: etc. Thanks all. -- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 -- pass it on -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
