On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:49:25 -0700 (PDT), George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 18, 2:08 pm, Joseph Turian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> How widely adopted is python 2.5? >> >> We are doing some development, and have a choice to make: >> a) Use all the 2.5 features we want. >> b) Maintain backwards compatability with 2.4. >> >> So I guess the question is, does anyone have a sense of what percent >> of python users don't have 2.5? > > Perhaps you should ask the inverse question too: what 2.5 features do > you find so compelling that you are willing to break compatibility > with 2.4 ? FWIW, the only new 2.5 feature I have been using in > practice is the conditional expressions, and I could easily live > without them. 2.4 is still pretty decent, and a major upgrade from > 2.3.
Another data point: I write some Python code in my work and some for hobby/private use, and I am very happy with 2.3. List comprehensions (or whatever they are called) and generators are the most recent features I would hate living without. OP: keep in mind that your users do not see any gain from you using 2.5. All they see is something that makes your software harder to install. At some point you can dismiss them as living in the Stone Age, but the Stone Age is currently 2.1 or something. Maybe 2.2 is, too. /Jorgen -- // Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu \X/ snipabacken.se> R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn! -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
