On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Eric Wertman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Perhaps the wrong idea of what the group is. I would have thought >> that >> if one had a sufficiently developed idea and wanted to have it / >> formally/ >> rejected, rather than merely sniped at, then writting a PEP would be >> more >> apposite than posting to c.l.py. >> >> It's fine to post your not sufficiently developed ideas here merely >> to >> have them discussed. But I don't know what makes you feel that you, >> or >> your ideas, are /entitled/ to any response at all, much less >> "follow-through." > > > To expand on this a little bit, I've been subscribed to this group > for a couple of months, but there seems to be a bit more gray area > between what would go to a 'python-dev' group and a 'python-user' > group. Long debates about language features and abstract ideas would > appeal to the former, but not the latter. Certainly I fall into the > user category.. I'm pretty happy with python, and generally just > adjust to it's design and features, rather than spend lots of time on > whether they are 'right' or could be 'better'. /shrug
Yeah, suggestions about changing the language are much better suited to the more-specific Python-ideas or Python-3000 mailinglists than the general-purpose c.l.p - Chris > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > -- Follow the path of the Iguana... http://rebertia.com -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
