On 2008-09-08, Chris Rebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Eric Wertman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> To expand on this a little bit, I've been subscribed to this >> group for a couple of months, but there seems to be a bit more >> gray area between what would go to a 'python-dev' group and a >> 'python-user' group. Long debates about language features and >> abstract ideas would appeal to the former, but not the latter. >> Certainly I fall into the user category.. I'm pretty happy >> with python, and generally just adjust to it's design and >> features, rather than spend lots of time on whether they are >> 'right' or could be 'better'. /shrug > > Yeah, suggestions about changing the language are much better > suited to the more-specific Python-ideas or Python-3000 > mailinglists than the general-purpose c.l.p
I don't think anybody here in c.l.p minds reading suggestions for language features/changes, but often what the poster in question writes is just an incomprehensible collection of vaguely philosophical-sounding metaphores and similes reminiscent of a hoax paper submitted as a joke to a post-modern "journal" of some pretend science or other. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Used staples are good at with SOY SAUCE! visi.com -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list