Erik Max Francis wrote: [...] > And made all purdy-like: > > http://www.alcyone.com/tmp/python-list%20traffic.pdf
That's very pretty, but neither the volume of posts, nor the quality of the people posting here is really what I was talking about. I don't think I explained very well, but seeing the posts here helped clarify things a little. c.l.python used to be the core of a community built around a language. It no longer is. It is a very useful place, where some very helpful and knowledgeable people hang out and give advice, but instead of representing the full interests of the Python community it is now very much a resource for helping new users. At least, that's how it seems to me. And I don't think this is necessarily "natural" or "normal" - I think it may be a failure on the part of someone (who? I don't quite know, perhaps all of us) in managing a community. Now there is an obvious argument against that - that the language was becoming so popular that a single meeting place was no longer practical - but without a crystal ball it is hard to know how true that is, or what alternatives might have been. I feel quite strongly about this. I thought that c.l.python was almost exceptional in the range (the perl group was another, similar community back then). I do worry that someone might have screwed up in a quite major way, and that Python will suffer seriously, in the longer term, as a result. Another reason might be that the action has moved on to Haskell. I get the impression that it is undergoing the same kind of surge in popularity from the "smart early adopters" that Python might have benefited from back in the day (for some perverse reason I am actually moving back to Python from more strongly typed functional languages). Andrew -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list