On Mar 30, 4:36 pm, Michele Simionato <michele.simion...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 30, 3:31 pm, srepmub <mark.duf...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > for the record, the input forShedskinis pure Python, so there is no > > added syntax or optional type declaration system. that said, I can > > understand it not being on some list for not being production-ready. > > > thanks, > > mark dufour. > > But doesShedSkinaccepts all valid Python constructs? > I thought there were restrictions.
there are certainly several important restrictions, but what I meant was that if it works with Shedskin it is also valid Python code, and there are no hidden type declarations or hints hidden in docstrings and such. thanks, mark dufour. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
