On Mar 30, 3:31 pm, srepmub <mark.duf...@gmail.com> wrote: > for the record, the input for Shedskin is pure Python, so there is no > added syntax or optional type declaration system. that said, I can > understand it not being on some list for not being production-ready. > > thanks, > mark dufour.
But does ShedSkin accepts all valid Python constructs? I thought there were restrictions. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
