On Jun 18, 6:07 am, Jochen Schulz <m...@well-adjusted.de> wrote: > Terry Reedy: > > > Jochen Schulz wrote: > > >> If, by "object-oriented" you mean "everything has to be put into > >> classes", then Python is not object-oriented. > > > That depends on what you mean by 'put into classes' (and 'everything'). > > :) What I meant was that in Python you can write code without defining > your own classes at all. I had Java in mind where you cannot write a > program without using the keyword 'class'. But I think we agree here.
Numbers have infinite precision. </gibberish> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
