Matej Cepl <mc...@redhat.com> writes: > Well, I could at least passively read many languages (starting with > Pascal, C, and unsuccessful attempt to learn Prolog, so even > statically typed languages are not that mysterious to me),
I wouldn't count Pascal or C as statically typed in any interesting way. C++ (template generics), ML, or Haskell would be more meaningful. Prolog is worth spending more time on, and it's on my own list. > so learning new ones is not that problem. And yes, to be completely > honest, functional languages are my weakest part (although I have used > Emacs for some time, I still haven't learned writing in any Lisp > properly). You might start with Abelson and Sussman's classic book: http://mitpress.mit.edu/sicp -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
