In article <[email protected]>, Cameron Simpson <[email protected]> wrote:
> This, I think, is a core issue in this misunderstanding. (I got bitten > by this too, maybe a year ago. My error, and I'm glad to have improved > my understanding.) > > All of you are saying "two names for the same module", and variations > thereof. And that is why the doco confuses. > > I would expect less confusion if the above example were described as > _two_ modules, with the same source code. +1 -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
