Cameron Simpson <c...@zip.com.au> writes: > All of you are saying "two names for the same module", and variations > thereof. And that is why the doco confuses. > > I would expect less confusion if the above example were described as > _two_ modules, with the same source code.
That's not true though, is it? It's the same module object with two different references, I thought. Also, even if what you say were true, “source code” implies the module was loaded from source code, when Python allows loading modules with no source code available. So that implication just seems to be inviting different confusion. -- \ “I'm not a bad guy! I work hard, and I love my kids. So why | `\ should I spend half my Sunday hearing about how I'm going to | _o__) Hell?” —Homer Simpson | Ben Finney -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list