On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Michael Herrmann
<michael.herrm...@getautoma.com> wrote:
> notepad_1 = start("Notepad")
> notepad_2 = start("Notepad")
> notepad_1.write("Hello World!")
> notepad_1.press(CTRL + 'a', CTRL + 'c')
> notepad_2.press(CTRL + 'v')
Explicit is better than implicit. Changing windows should be explicit
and not implified by your library.
> notepad_1 = start("Notepad")
> notepad_2 = start("Notepad")
> switch_to(notepad_1)
> write("Hello World!")
> press(CTRL + 'a', CTRL + 'c')
> switch_to(notepad_2)
> press(CTRL + 'v')
Much better.
> notepad_1 = start("Notepad")
> notepad_2 = start("Notepad")
> with notepad_1:
> write("Hello World!")
> press(CTRL + 'a', CTRL + 'c')
> with notepad_2:
> press(CTRL + 'v')
That’s ugly, and don’t forget that your users aren’t Pythonistas most
of the time.
> notepad_1 = start("Notepad")
> notepad_2 = start("Notepad")
> notepad_1.activate()
> write("Hello World!")
> press(CTRL + 'a', CTRL + 'c')
> notepad_2.activate()
> press(CTRL + 'v')
That is nice and makes sense, because a global function feels wrong,
at least for me.
> It would be extremely helpful for us if you could let me know which way of
> using the API you would prefer. If you opt for an explicit version, how would
> you call the respective method? "activate" / "switch_to" / "focus" or
> something else?
Window().focus() is the best IMO.
PS. do you plan a version for non-Windows OSes? Also, €99 is too expensive.
--
Kwpolska <http://kwpolska.tk> | GPG KEY: 5EAAEA16
stop html mail | always bottom-post
http://asciiribbon.org | http://caliburn.nl/topposting.html
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
