Στις 25/10/2013 11:33 πμ, ο/η Chris Angelico έγραψε:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Νίκος Αλεξόπουλος
<nikos.gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Isn't this strange?
No matter if you visit a webpage as a direct hit or via a referer the cookie
on the visitor's browser should have been present.
But it can only can be found and retrieved as a direct hit and _not_ from a
referrer backlink.
Trace your logs. You've been told this before; are you sure the
request is even getting to your server?
Please be more detailed to what you want me to check.
Fundamentally, you're caring about things that it's a LOT easier to
not care about. Just let things happen, and don't try to track people
so much. Not only will some people object to it (are you, for
instance, complying with EU regulations about cookies?), but you're
going to keep running into situations where you just *can't* track
people, no matter how hard you try.
If an expert want to hide from my tracking of course he can use a proxy,
or a TOR service, or incognito Chrome mode or whatever to bypass cookie
tracking. But the usual visitors wont even know these things and their
browser will accept cookies.
I do this not as a way to track everybody, but to learn handling
cookies, database storing of cookies ans stuff like that.
But i cannot overcome this weird baclink referring visits that tend to
ignore cookies stored in the browser.
I need an explanation for that because it screwns my visitors databases.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
