On 01/01/2016 20:03, paul.hermeneu...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark, it is good to know that a decision has been made so that we can move
forward.
Is there a summary document that discusses the options examined and why
others did not meet the requirements? I am -NOT- trying to dredge up
arguments about the choice. I am guessing that there have been some.
If this fact-based decision was based solely on the fact that the BDFL
prefers GitHub, please just say so. It is clear that git is a capable tool.
There is no point in targetting any queries at me, I'm just the messenger :)
I've loosly followed the discussion on the core workflow mailing list,
but frankly much of that said goes right over my head, as my knowledge
of GitHub, GitLab, Mercurial and all the rest of them is roughly zero.
There is all ready disagreement over the decision. I'll sit back and
let the core developers sort that out, confident that eventually we'll
end up with working processes backed up by working systems.
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
