I see that this would work once you've installed the package, but how do you develop it? Say you are working on a change that modifies both email.py and reports.py. Do you run setup.py every time you make a change in email.py?
On Sunday, February 7, 2016 at 1:35:15 AM UTC-5, Kevin Conway wrote: > > My question is: is this crazy? Please tell me there's a better way and I > just wasted my time creating this package. > > There is a better way and you have wasted your time creating this package. > > I hear your problem statement as asking two questions. The first is: What > is the right way to include executable content in my Python project? The > second is: How do I expose executable content from a Python project? > > As to the first question, from your project README: > > Say you have a python project (not a package), with the following > structure: > > All Python code that you want to install and make available in any form, > import or executable, _must_ be contained within a Python package. > Organizing Python code in any way other than Python packages will result in > the challenges you have described. The correct way to include executable > content is to place the Python code within the package structure. It should > not be put in other directories within the repository root. > > As to the second question, once all Python code is contained within a > package that can be installed you can use setuptools entry points to expose > the executable code. The setup() function from setuptools that is used to > create setup.py files has an argument called 'entry_points' that allows you > to expose executable content over the command line. See [1] and [2] for > more details. > > Feel free to reach out to me off-list if you have a specific project you > need advice on. The rules for organizing and packaging Python code aren't > complex but they tend to cause new Python developers to stumble at first. A > general rule I give everyone when talking about packaging or importing > code: If you have to modify sys.path to makes something work then you have > most certainly made a mistake. > > [1] > https://pythonhosted.org/setuptools/setuptools.html#automatic-script-creation > [2] > http://python-packaging.readthedocs.org/en/latest/command-line-scripts.html#the-console-scripts-entry-point > > > On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 8:54 PM Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 1:47 PM, <dimv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Imsanity allows you to make imports usable (not ideal, but at least > > usable) for python projects without having to manage PYTHONPATHs or do > > whacky stuff like running files with python -m or put even whackier > > boilerplate at the top of every file. And all it requires is 'import > > imsanity' at the top of every file. You can put it in a macro or even just > > type it because it's short and easy to remember. > > > > > > My question is: is this crazy? Please tell me there's a better way and I > > just wasted my time creating this package. There's nothing I'd like to hear > > more. > > > > Well, anything that makes you type "import imsanity" at the top of > > every script MUST be crazy. :) I don't know about the actual > > content/purpose though. Good luck with it! > > > > ChrisA > > -- > > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > > -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list