<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Mike Schilling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> "Rich Teer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Mike Schilling wrote: >> > >> >> Another advantage is that evewry internet-enabled computer today >> >> already comes with an HTML renderer (AKA browser), so that a >> >> message saved to a file can be read very easily. >> > >> > I think you're missing the point: email and Usenet are, >> > historically have been, and should always be, plain text mediums. >> >> Gosh, if you say they should be, there's no point trying to have an >> intelligent discussion, is there? > > Errm, isn't that what you're doing as well then? Rich just gave an > opinion, you've been giving an opinion. Rich's opinion happens to have > a lot of history and good reasons behind it. I don't see why it should > be viewed as some kind of discussion ending dogmatism.
I see a difference between "X would be useful for A, B, and C" and "Y will always be the only proper way." Don't you? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
