billiejoex wrote: > I'm sorry. Maybe you misunderstanded. > I know the great advanteges deriving by using interpretation too, I > appreciate it very much (I'm newbie in Python and the interpeter really > helps me out in many situations), but a 'pure' interpretated language needs > obligatorily an interpreter and (sorry for repeating) this could be a > problem for distribution (imho).
Do youself a favour - google this group for that question. You'll get plenty of answers to your questions and allegations. This dead Horse has been beaten to hell and back. Really. Diez -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
