Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I chose CherryPy in part because its license allows this. I > would have considered Karrigell if it had a different license.
Have you had to modify CherryPy in some substantive way that you needed to keep proprietary, as opposed to simply developing content that CherryPy serves but is completely independent of CherryPy's license? I notice that a heck of a lot of commercial users are using completely proprietary packages like ASP, whose licenses are far more restrictive than the GPL. They don't seem to think it's a problem. So for most such users, Karrigell shouldn't be a problem either. Remember that the GPL only applies to the code of Karrigell itself, not to stuff that you write using it. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
