Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You've lost me here. The server certainly would contain Karrigell > code, it wouldn't function without it. I don't understand the analogy > to GCC, the web site is not something that is compiled with > Karrigell. Karrigell is a library or framework that is an essential > part of the server. I don't know how I would write the app without > Karrigell.
Let me ask it this way: suppose you used ASP instead. As I understand ASP, it's like PHP except it's proprietary. Would ASP's license be a problem? Maybe you're using "the server" to encompass too much. If I have an Apache-based web site, then the web server is Apache. If I have a Python CGI script that the Apache server runs, the CGI script is not "the server"--it's an application running under the server. It would not be affected by the GPL if Apache used the GPL. Karrigell scripts seem to me to work out about the same way. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
