Ronald Oussoren wrote: > On Monday, April 23, 2007, at 02:46PM, "Ulysses Known" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:
>> Perhaps this is not possible, however I do see the following egg names >> through google so I wonder if it is possible: >> >> numpy-1.0.2.dev3507-py2.5-macosx-10.4-i386.egg >> >> Thanks for your help. > > I'm not sure why numpy doesn't distribute a universal binary egg, that's > rather user unfriendly if you ask me. Universal binaries are the best way to > package software, users shouldn't have to worry about what CPU type they have > in their machine. Please be careful with accusations of user-unfriendliness. Whatever reference Ulysses found, it certainly wasn't to any officially distributed egg. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
