Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] easy_install question

[Ronald Oussoren]

On 23 Apr, 2007, at 21:31, Robert Kern wrote:

Ronald Oussoren wrote:

On Monday, April 23, 2007, at 02:46PM, "Ulysses Known" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Perhaps this is not possible, however I do see the following egg names

through google so I wonder if it is possible:

numpy-1.0.2.dev3507-py2.5-macosx-10.4-i386.egg

Thanks for your help.

I'm not sure why numpy doesn't distribute a universal binary egg, that's rather user unfriendly if you ask me. Universal binaries are the best way to package software, users shouldn't have to worry about what CPU type they have in their machine.

Ulysses found, it certainly wasn't to any officially distributed egg.

Please be careful with accusations of user-unfriendliness. Whatever reference

Ronald

I should have been more careful in phrasing my response, sorry about that.

--
Robert Kern


 an underlying truth."
  -- Umberto Eco

_______________________________________________
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig

"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig