On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 09:40:10AM +0200, Magnus Kulke wrote: > On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 01:23:31PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > Do you need separate groupings ? If the maintainers are the same in both > > cases, and changes are liable to span both accel/mshv and target/i386/mshv > > dir, then perhaps 'target/i386/mshv/' is fine being listed under the > > 'MSHV' group ? > > that's true. however, there is work ongoing to add MSHV support to other > targets, so eventually it wouldn't be the same maintainers for both.
Ok, that's sounds fine then. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
