On 06/06/2012 02:38 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 06/05/2012 06:26 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 06/05/2012 04:00 AM, Michael Roth wrote: >>> Initial check-in of the qidl-generated vmstate fields for rtc. >>> >> >> Don't, please. > > As Mike said in another note, we want to keep the device schema in the > tree so we can determine when it changes in 'make check' and complain > loudly. > > But I think we need a better way to do this. Something like a 'make > schema-update' target that will regenerate schemas and prepare them for > checkin.
Yes, that's much better. Also would be good to pretty-print them so that incremental changes are easy to spot using 'diff'. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
