On Sun, 6 Sept 2026 at 20:44, Gilles Grimaud <[email protected]> wrote: > > This RFC adds a Raspberry Pi Pico / RP2040 machine to QEMU. > > The work continues the RP2040/Pico RFC posted by Alex Bennee in 2022: > > https://patchew.org/QEMU/20220110175104.2908956-1-alex.bennee%40linaro.org/ > > The target is intended primarily for debugging bare-metal Pico firmware and > for running firmware tests in CI without physical hardware. It provides a > functional, test-oriented model rather than a cycle-accurate RP2040 model.
Something odd seems to have happened with the way you sent this patchset. Instead of the expected structure where all the patch emails are replies to the cover letter, instead, what we got was that patches 18-30 are replies to patch 17, and patches 32-36 are replies to patch 31. You can see this in the "thread overview" in the mailing list archive: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/[email protected]/ The result is that automated tooling like patchew doesn't see the whole series: https://patchew.org/QEMU/[email protected]/ (it thinks only 18 patches arrived). If you could have a look at what went wrong there for your next revision of the patchset that would be helpful. thanks -- PMM
