On Thu, 2026-10-15 at 19:48 +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 15/10/26 19:42, Pierrick Bouvier wrote: > > On 10/15/2026 10:37 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > > On 14/10/26 23:05, Pierrick Bouvier wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > --- > > > > target/riscv/cpu.h | 2 +- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h > > > > index 8c8ffe94cd8..00650a66dcb 100644 > > > > --- a/target/riscv/cpu.h > > > > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h > > > > @@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ FIELD(EXT_TB_FLAGS, BIG_ENDIAN, 33, 1) > > > > #ifdef TARGET_RISCV32 > > > > #define riscv_cpu_mxl(env) ((void)(env), MXL_RV32) > > > > #else > > > > -static inline RISCVMXL riscv_cpu_mxl(CPURISCVState *env) > > > > +static inline RISCVMXL riscv_cpu_mxl(const CPURISCVState *env) > > > > { > > > > return env->misa_mxl; > > > > } > > > > > > Reviewed 6 weeks ago and in Alistair riscv-next queue IIRC: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20260901095229.72018-17- > > > [email protected]/ > > > > > > Anyway, > > > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]> > > > > > > > Did you flush the rest, or is it going through all submaintainers > > trees? > > > > I feel that system wide series like this should be sent on their > > own at > > once to avoid having a state spread across multiple people with > > different latencies. > > No, Alistair queued patches I'm depending on, and I consider a > maintainer sending the "patch queued" message a lock on the > patch. I'm stuck waiting for preliminary riscv-related patches > to get merge to reduce conflict with Alistair tree. Meanwhile > my tree grows so I'm not sure anymore it is a good process, > maybe I should have posted a PR and let Alistair deal with > the rebase conflicts. We still have 10 days until the freeze > so I guess we are still in time.
Sorry, with all the conference travel the last month I haven't had a chance to get through patches and send PRs, so it's been a bit delayed. Then there was a conflict with the meson tests in the first PR. An updated PR should be sent today and hopefully merged soon Alistair
