On 02/28/2014 02:04 AM, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: > On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 15:59 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 27/02/2014 15:39, Marcel Apfelbaum ha scritto: >>>>> >>>>> Each of them highlights one of the two aspects that, in my opinion, make >>>>> QOM interesting (respectively, unification of interfaces and the >>>>> containment tree). >>> I was planning to tackle the replacement of the machine from a container >>> to an actual object too, however this patch conflicts with my >>> series because I already have a QOM Machine object created *always* >>> and this patch adds another object *sometimes*. >>> >>> Is this patch's functionality in use yet? Any idea how to merge those ideas? >> >> pseries simply wants to make /machine implement the FWPathProvider >> interface. As long as you have a way for boards to specify a TypeInfo >> for /machine, this patch will not get in the way. > Thanks Paolo! I'll be aware not to brake this functionality. > Marcel
What is the outcome of this discussion for the patches I posted? Do I have to wait till you finish that machine properties rework and repost or...? Thanks. -- Alexey
