Il 28/02/2014 16:03, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
On 02/28/2014 02:04 AM, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 15:59 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 27/02/2014 15:39, Marcel Apfelbaum ha scritto:
Each of them highlights one of the two aspects that, in my opinion, make
QOM interesting (respectively, unification of interfaces and the
containment tree).
I was planning to tackle the replacement of the machine from a container
to an actual object too, however this patch conflicts with my
series because I already have a QOM Machine object created *always*
and this patch adds another object *sometimes*.
Is this patch's functionality in use yet? Any idea how to merge those ideas?
pseries simply wants to make /machine implement the FWPathProvider
interface. As long as you have a way for boards to specify a TypeInfo
for /machine, this patch will not get in the way.
Thanks Paolo! I'll be aware not to brake this functionality.
Marcel
What is the outcome of this discussion for the patches I posted? Do I have
to wait till you finish that machine properties rework and repost or...?
Your patches are fine. Who gets in first, wins. The other, rebases. :)
Paolo
