On 6 May 2014 07:08, Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.igles...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.igles...@xilinx.com>
>
> No functional change.
> Prepares for future additions of the EL2 and 3 versions of this reg.
> --- a/target-arm/machine.c
> +++ b/target-arm/machine.c
> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_arm_cpu = {
> VMSTATE_UINT32_ARRAY(env.banked_r14, ARMCPU, 6),
> VMSTATE_UINT32_ARRAY(env.usr_regs, ARMCPU, 5),
> VMSTATE_UINT32_ARRAY(env.fiq_regs, ARMCPU, 5),
> - VMSTATE_UINT64(env.elr_el1, ARMCPU),
> + VMSTATE_UINT64(env.elr_el[ELR_EL_IDX(1)], ARMCPU),
> VMSTATE_UINT64_ARRAY(env.sp_el, ARMCPU, 2),
> /* The length-check must come before the arrays to avoid
> * incoming data possibly overflowing the array.
Do we add the rest of the elr_el[] array to the vmstate in
a later patch?
thanks
-- PMM
