On 03/11/2010 01:57 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
+struct QEMUNotifier
> +{
> + void (*notify)(QEMUNotifier *notifier);
> +};
I suggest combining this with QEMUBH.
I didn't understand this suggestion exactly, but I think it's related
that I didn't understand the advantage of making QEMUNotifier a struct.
Instead of using container_of, reusing QEMUBHFunc (renamed to
QEMUCallbackFunc maybe?) in QEMUNotifierNode like this:
struct QEMUNotifierNode {
QEMUCallbackFunc notify;
void *opaque;
QTAILQ_ENTRY(QEMUNotifierNode) node;
};
void qemu_notifier_list_init(QEMUNotifierList *list);
struct QEMUNotifierNode *
qemu_notifier_list_add(QEMUNotifierList *list,
QEMUCallbackFunc notify, void *opaque);
void qemu_notifier_list_remove(QEMUNotifierList *list,
QEMUNotifierNode *notifier);
void qemu_notifier_list_notify(QEMUNotifierList *list);
seems cleaner. You would place the QEMUNotifierNode in VncState in
order to do the removal later.
Besides this, the patchset is very nice indeed.
Paolo