On 03/11/2010 02:58 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
On 03/11/2010 01:57 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
+struct QEMUNotifier
+{
+ void (*notify)(QEMUNotifier *notifier);
+};
I suggest combining this with QEMUBH.
I didn't understand this suggestion exactly, but I think it's related
that I didn't understand the advantage of making QEMUNotifier a struct.
My point is that we already have a mechanism for providing event notification
callbacks, specifically QEMUBH. Why invent a new one?
QEMUBH seems seriously overengineered for this simple task.
Paolo
