> On 03/11/2010 01:57 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
> > +struct QEMUNotifier
> >
> > > +{
> > > + void (*notify)(QEMUNotifier *notifier);
> > > +};
> >
> > I suggest combining this with QEMUBH.
>
> I didn't understand this suggestion exactly, but I think it's related
> that I didn't understand the advantage of making QEMUNotifier a struct.My point is that we already have a mechanism for providing event notification callbacks, specifically QEMUBH. Why invent a new one? Paul
