Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > On 4 March 2015 at 00:07, Marcel Apfelbaum <mar...@redhat.com> wrote: >> In the mean time this series depends on Igor's ACPI dynamic series that took >> a lot of time to review and even Michael's PULL request with it is not yet >> in master. > > You can view this as an argument against enormous pull requests > with nearly a hundred patches in them -- they're much more likely > to hit multiple issues in submission with minor things that need > fixing, simply because of their size...
Yes. The current PCI pull request is clearly too big for its own good.
