On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 05:48:37PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> writes: > > > On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 12:14:21AM +0900, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> On 4 March 2015 at 00:07, Marcel Apfelbaum <mar...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > In the mean time this series depends on Igor's ACPI dynamic series that > >> > took > >> > a lot of time to review and even Michael's PULL request with it is not > >> > yet > >> > in master. > >> > >> You can view this as an argument against enormous pull requests > >> with nearly a hundred patches in them -- they're much more likely > >> to hit multiple issues in submission with minor things that need > >> fixing, simply because of their size... > >> > >> thanks > >> -- PMM > > > > Right. There were acpi changes by Igor and PCI changes by Markus, > > The latter is my "[PATCH 00/10] pci: Partial conversion to realize". > Quite a few pending series depend on it. > > > trying to merge them at once is what created this. > > I guess I could instead just do two unrelated pull requests > > that can be merged in parallel. Though in Marcel's case, the > > problems were all in Igor's patches and these are exactly > > the ones Marcel's code depends on. > > If we can decouple the two, problems with one won't hold up the other > anymore. > > I can do a pull request for just my series, if that helps.
I think it's not necessary at this point. > But I'm > prepared to leave that coveted, glamorous and rewarding job to you ;)