On 02/04/2016 01:41 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 04.02.2016 um 12:31 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
On 03/02/2016 20:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 03:55:04PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 06:00:31PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
[...]
It looks like this series might go nowhere but this patch
is not tied to it and useful to us in general
so perhaps you could pick it up after ACKs from
S390/SPAPR maintainers.
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
We don't have a maintainer for hw/core/machine.c, hw/core/qdev*,
and related files.
Assuming we don't have a volunteer to maintain them officially,
can we agree on a default destination for those patches so they
don't linger on the list? Michael? Andreas?
Not me please. Have too much on my plate.
Would you like to maintain it yourself?
That's my suggestion too. I guess Igor and I could help with reviews,
but testing and sending the pull requests would add too much work.
Since you're the main one touching it, it makes sense for you to handle it.
You're talking about machine, right? Some time ago I had proposed Marcel
who initially worked on it, but I'm fine with anyone taking it.
Hi,
As I previously said I can maintain the machine and the related code.
I'll gladly help Eduardo with reviews or have a tree ready for machine/qdev
and send pull requests if Peter agrees to it.
Eduardo, Peter what is your take on this?
Thanks,
Marcel
For some (but not all) core qdev parts related to the (stalled) QOM
migration I've been taking care of via qom-next. Last time this came up
you didn't want anyone to be M: for qdev, so maybe we can use R: so that
at least people automatically get CC'ed and we avoid this recurring
discussion?
Regards,
Andreas
