On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 12:55:22PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 04/02/2016 12:41, Andreas Färber wrote: > > You're talking about machine, right? Some time ago I had proposed Marcel > > who initially worked on it, but I'm fine with anyone taking it. > > Yes. > > > For some (but not all) core qdev parts related to the (stalled) QOM > > migration I've been taking care of via qom-next. Last time this came up > > you didn't want anyone to be M: for qdev, so maybe we can use R: so that > > at least people automatically get CC'ed and we avoid this recurring > > discussion? > > I might have changed my mind on that. You definitely should be M: for qdev. > > Paolo
If Andreas wants to, that's also fine. Several maintainers are better than one. -- MST
