Am 04.02.2016 um 12:31 schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > On 03/02/2016 20:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 03:55:04PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 06:00:31PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: >>> [...] >>>> It looks like this series might go nowhere but this patch >>>> is not tied to it and useful to us in general >>>> so perhaps you could pick it up after ACKs from >>>> S390/SPAPR maintainers. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> >>> >>> We don't have a maintainer for hw/core/machine.c, hw/core/qdev*, >>> and related files. >>> >>> Assuming we don't have a volunteer to maintain them officially, >>> can we agree on a default destination for those patches so they >>> don't linger on the list? Michael? Andreas? >> >> Not me please. Have too much on my plate. >> Would you like to maintain it yourself? > > That's my suggestion too. I guess Igor and I could help with reviews, > but testing and sending the pull requests would add too much work. > Since you're the main one touching it, it makes sense for you to handle it.
You're talking about machine, right? Some time ago I had proposed Marcel who initially worked on it, but I'm fine with anyone taking it. For some (but not all) core qdev parts related to the (stalled) QOM migration I've been taking care of via qom-next. Last time this came up you didn't want anyone to be M: for qdev, so maybe we can use R: so that at least people automatically get CC'ed and we avoid this recurring discussion? Regards, Andreas -- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
