On 03/09/16 13:44, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 9 March 2016 at 19:40, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> wrote: >> Laszlo is going to shoot me for saying this, but as a compromise >> between the Windows crowd in the Intel firmware team and the more >> Linux/open source oriented people on the opposite side, using github >> does not sound like an entirely unreasonable compromise. At least it >> means no emails anymore with garbled patches and 300 character lines >> in the commit log > > By the way, why are you all discussing the EDK2 patch workflow > proposals on qemu-devel and not on an EDK mailing list?
Sorry, that's where we started, and the rest of the discussion should happen there; I agree. The reason for coming here was that we ended up questioning / re-examining the practices we had taken as examples: QEMU, Linux. I needed some info from the source, and I wanted to allow anyone on qemu-devel to chime in. (This is why I didn't ask only you personally, edk2-devel CC'd.) Thanks Laszlo
