On 02/05/2018 15:31, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> We do have infrastructure for class properties, we just don't use it much.
> ... the sane thing to do would be to limit this command to class
> properties, and use class properties for anything that doesn't *have* to
> be dynamic.  The second half of the sane thing looks like a substantial
> chunk of work, though.

It's not that big, but somebody has to focus on it.

Paolo

Reply via email to