Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> writes:
> Hi > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 9:41 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > <phi...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On 5/24/19 1:40 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: >> > Released last month. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> >> > --- >> > tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker | 2 +- >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker >> > b/tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker >> > index 69d4a7f5d7..1496b68ba1 100644 >> > --- a/tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker >> > +++ b/tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker >> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ >> > -FROM fedora:29 >> > +FROM fedora:30 >> >> Hmm this patch is pending for review: >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-05/msg00819.html > > Oh I missed that. Maybe we should use "latest" to avoid bumping the > version every 6 months. > > fwiw we have different versions: > > tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora-cris-cross.docker:FROM fedora:latest I'll fix that > tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora-i386-cross.docker:FROM fedora:29 The cross compilers images are different as they generally don't want to include the "native" libraries. For Debian based ones we do have a base image that everything builds up from but we haven't bothered for fedora as we only have a few so far. > tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker:FROM fedora:29 > > In 62559b916 "tests: update Fedora i386 cross image to Fedora 29", Daniel > said: > > Using the "latest" tag is not a good idea because this changes what > release it points to every 6 months. Together with caching of docker > builds this can cause confusion where CI has cached & built with Fedora > N, while a developer tries to reproduce a CI problem with Fedora N + 1, > or vica-verca. > > But at the same time, Daniel bumped f28 to f29 in commit 19a9978db1. > > It's confusing, do we need some stability or follow the latest? > >> >> > ENV PACKAGES \ >> > bc \ >> > bison \ >> > -- Alex Bennée