Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> writes: > On 6/7/19 8:59 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > [...] >> QOM is not a particularly active subsystem now: 51 commits in two years. >> >> We obviously need maintainers to review and merge patches. The nominal >> maintainer hasn't been doing that since 2015. Git shows the following >> top committers taking on / getting sucked into QOM: >> >> Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> >> Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> >> Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> >> Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> >> Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> >> >> We really need nominal maintainer(s) again. >> >> Of course, *active* maintainers would be even better: I consider QOM >> stuck in an unhappy place where much of its potential is still >> potential. >> >> But let's start small. Volunteers for the reviewer role, please step >> forward :) >> >> >> >> The details I promised: >> >> Output of "scripts/get_maintainer.pl --git --git-since='2-years-ago' | >> grep commit_signer" sorted by file size: >> > [...] >> = include/qom/object_interfaces.h = >> Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> (commit_signer:8/5=100%) >> Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com> (commit_signer:3/5=60%) >> "Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> (commit_signer:2/5=40%) >> "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4...@amsat.org> (commit_signer:2/5=40%) >> Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> (commit_signer:1/5=20%) > > get_maintainer's commit_signer is lying...
Any of Signed-off-by:, Reviewed-by:, Acked-by: counts as "commit_signer". [...] >> = qom/trace-events = >> Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> (commit_signer:2/2=100%) >> "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <phi...@redhat.com> (commit_signer:2/2=100%) >> Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> (commit_signer:1/2=50%) >> Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> (commit_signer:1/2=50%) > > This 'git log -p' history of this file is very interesting... Papershuffling...
