Hi,

On 6/26/19 3:28 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 12:01:10PM +0200, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Drew,
>>
>> On 6/21/19 6:34 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
>>> Suggested-by: Dave Martin <dave.mar...@arm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>  target/arm/helper.c | 1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
>>> index df4276f5f6ca..edba94004e0b 100644
>>> --- a/target/arm/helper.c
>>> +++ b/target/arm/helper.c
>>> @@ -5319,6 +5319,7 @@ static void zcr_write(CPUARMState *env, const 
>>> ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
>>>      int new_len;
>>>  
>>>      /* Bits other than [3:0] are RAZ/WI.  */
>>> +    QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(ARM_MAX_VQ > 16);
>> Can you document in the commit message why this check is critical?
> 
> Sure. I can copy+paste the email subject into the commit message :-)
Well that's not what I asked for. Are you enforcing an architectural
maximum of 2048 bits or is the limitation due to some data structs in
the existing code, ... For a non expert reviewer as I am it is not
totally obvious.

Thanks

Eric
> 
> drew
> 
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Eric
>>>      raw_write(env, ri, value & 0xf);
>>>  
>>>      /*
>>>
>>

Reply via email to