On 16.07.20 14:02, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:26:20 -0400
> Collin Walling <wall...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> On 7/15/20 12:04 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:36:35 -0400
>>> Collin Walling <wall...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Polite ping. Patches have been sitting on the list for a few weeks now,
>>>> and it doesn't look like any further changes are requested (hopefully I
>>>> didn't miss something).
>>>
>>> The only thing I had was (I think) the logging of the length you just
>>> replied to. We can still tweak things like that later, of course.
>>>
>>> As these patches depend on a headers sync, I could not yet queue them.
>>> I can keep a preliminary version on a branch. I assume that the header
>>> changes will go in during the next kernel merge window? (If I missed
>>> something, apologies for that.)
>>>
>>
>> Gotcha. Thanks for the update :)
>>
>> There was an email on the KVM list a couple of days that made one change
>> to the Linux header. Just changed the integer used for the DIAG cap,
>> which should be reflected in QEMU as well.
>>
>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg220548.html
>>
>> Should I respin this patch series to include the new ack's and account
>> for the header sync?
>
> No need for that, my tooling picks up acks and the headers update needs
> to be replaced with a sync against a proper Linux version anyway.
>
> I've queued the patches on a local branch, and the only patch that did
> not apply cleanly was the headers patch, which will get replaced later
> anyway :) Just ping me when the kernel patches hit upstream, then I'll
> do a header sync against the next -rc and queue the patches on
> s390-next.
What is the status of this patchset? The kernel part has been merged in 5.9-rc1.
