On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 10:46:23 +0200 Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:54:40 +0200 > Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote: > > > On 16.07.20 14:02, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:26:20 -0400 > > > Collin Walling <wall...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > >> On 7/15/20 12:04 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > >>> On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:36:35 -0400 > > >>> Collin Walling <wall...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Polite ping. Patches have been sitting on the list for a few weeks now, > > >>>> and it doesn't look like any further changes are requested (hopefully I > > >>>> didn't miss something). > > >>> > > >>> The only thing I had was (I think) the logging of the length you just > > >>> replied to. We can still tweak things like that later, of course. > > >>> > > >>> As these patches depend on a headers sync, I could not yet queue them. > > >>> I can keep a preliminary version on a branch. I assume that the header > > >>> changes will go in during the next kernel merge window? (If I missed > > >>> something, apologies for that.) > > >>> > > >> > > >> Gotcha. Thanks for the update :) > > >> > > >> There was an email on the KVM list a couple of days that made one change > > >> to the Linux header. Just changed the integer used for the DIAG cap, > > >> which should be reflected in QEMU as well. > > >> > > >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg220548.html > > >> > > >> Should I respin this patch series to include the new ack's and account > > >> for the header sync? > > > > > > No need for that, my tooling picks up acks and the headers update needs > > > to be replaced with a sync against a proper Linux version anyway. > > > > > > I've queued the patches on a local branch, and the only patch that did > > > not apply cleanly was the headers patch, which will get replaced later > > > anyway :) Just ping me when the kernel patches hit upstream, then I'll > > > do a header sync against the next -rc and queue the patches on > > > s390-next. > > > > What is the status of this patchset? The kernel part has been merged in > > 5.9-rc1. > > > > Thanks for letting me know, I'll go and process this now. (Had some > busy weeks + PTO.) There were some minor conflicts, please double check that everything looks sane. Thanks, applied.